Sponsored By

Let Workers Engage RemotelyLet Workers Engage Remotely

Data shows remote work leads to better employee engagement. Are you approaching this workplace strategy holistically?

Eric Krapf

February 24, 2020

3 Min Read
Let Workers Engage Remotely

Engaged employees tend to split their time between remote and in-office work, equipping this configuration requires a holistic strategy.

If there's one factor that unites the efforts of enterprise IT, HR, and Facilities/Real Estate professionals, it's the drive to improve employee engagement. Whether your job is to provide employees with technology, workspaces, or policies and practices to guide their work, your strategy should be based on what will best improve employee engagement. And a recent report from Gallup indicates that allowing remote work can be a major factor in better employee engagement.

Stepping back for a second, what exactly is employee engagement? Here's what Gallup has to say:

Engagement is not an exercise in making employees feel happy — it's a strategy for better business outcomes. It is true that engaged employees are more enthusiastic, energetic and positive, feel better about their work and workplace, and have better physical health, but engagement isn't a perk for leaders to dole out, it's a way leaders can improve KPIs. As decades of Gallup research shows, when employees are engaged their performance soars: Highly engaged workplaces can claim 41% lower absenteeism, 40% fewer quality defects, and 21% higher profitability.

Gallup's research found that the optimal amount of remote work is three to four days a week. Among those who work remotely three to four days a week, 41% reported feeling engaged with work. Ironically, two groups tied for the lowest level of engagement — those who work remotely all the time, and those who never work remotely; just 30% of each of these groups reported feeling engaged.

The idea of remote work pairs naturally with the concept of flex time, and here also Gallup found employee-friendly policies pay off. Fifty-one percent of respondents said they would switch jobs to get flex time, and 53% said work-life balance is "very important" to them.

All of this suggests that it's never been more important for IT, HR, and Facilities/Real Estate leaders to work together in crafting workplace strategies. If your most engaged employees split their time between remote and in-office work, equipping this configuration requires a holistic strategy. To accommodate the remote work days, IT and HR would take the lead — IT making sure that employees have the technology tools they need to support their work away from the office, while HR provides the support from a human-factors perspective, so workers understand policies and best practices when they work remotely.

And when these same folks are working in the office, all three groups must come together: IT has to make sure that applications and other technology interfaces work seamlessly relative to the remote-work experience; the office space should accommodate remote workers while continuing to support those who have to come in every day; and HR must advocate for facilities and policies that make the most of the physical space and the time that employees spend there.

By now, we're a couple of decades into the remote-work revolution, but it seems that many enterprises are still struggling to get it right. By working together, HR, IT, and Facilities/Real Estate can make the case and provide the means and spaces to offer a better chance at success.

About the Author

Eric Krapf

Eric Krapf is General Manager and Program Co-Chair for Enterprise Connect, the leading conference/exhibition and online events brand in the enterprise communications industry. He has been Enterprise Connect.s Program Co-Chair for over a decade. He is also publisher of No Jitter, the Enterprise Connect community.s daily news and analysis website.
 

Eric served as editor of No Jitter from its founding in 2007 until taking over as publisher in 2015. From 1996 to 2004, Eric was managing editor of Business Communications Review (BCR) magazine, and from 2004 to 2007, he was the magazine's editor. BCR was a highly respected journal of the business technology and communications industry.
 

Before coming to BCR, he was managing editor and senior editor of America's Network magazine, covering the public telecommunications industry. Prior to working in high-tech journalism, he was a reporter and editor at newspapers in Connecticut and Texas.

You May Also Like