Sponsored By

When Telepresence Sounds BadWhen Telepresence Sounds Bad

What's the most important element in a telepresence system? Would you believe the audio?

Eric Krapf

September 25, 2009

2 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

What's the most important element in a telepresence system? Would you believe the audio?

What's the most important element in a telepresence system? Would you believe the audio?That's what Joe Frost of Psytechnics told me yesterday. I was talking with Joe about Psytechnics' new developments around telepresence quality monitoring/management--more about that in a second. "Users actually do tolerate video blocking and breaking up," Joe said. "It's the audio [degradation] they can't tolerate."

Back up a second. This is telepresence; you're not supposed to have degradation of any kind, are you? Actually, the scenario is one where telepresence is sort of a victim of its own success. That's also where the latest Psytechnics announcement comes in.

Psytechnics used this week's VON show to announce support for Cisco Telepresence in the Psytechnics Experience Manager product. In the early days of Telepresence, you didn't necessarily need a service management tool like Psytechnics', because the implementations were so expensive and high-profile that they tended to get provisioned with 15 Mbps of dedicated bandwidth to each of the sites where a Telepresence room was deployed, often run as a standalone managed service. No one was taking any chances about quality.

But what's been happening as telepresence deployments have spread, according to Joe Frost, is that enterprises are starting to deploy slimmed-down telepresence implementations in smaller remote sites--usually one HD screen instead of the 3 used in a full-blown Telepresence suite; and the system usually shares a WAN pipe with whatever else is going into the remote site, almost guaranteeing that the single screen won't get 5 Mpbs out, not to mention what happens when you try to deliver traffic from the heavy-duty telepresence suites into the smaller site.

Hence the need for a tool like Experience Manager, which can manage the traffic into the smaller site and give those users the best possible performance within the limitations they have.

So while telepresence may need to be pristine at the big, high-profile suites, you can still tie those suites to smaller sites and expand the collaborative experience. As long as the audio works.What's the most important element in a telepresence system? Would you believe the audio?

About the Author

Eric Krapf

Eric Krapf is General Manager and Program Co-Chair for Enterprise Connect, the leading conference/exhibition and online events brand in the enterprise communications industry. He has been Enterprise Connect.s Program Co-Chair for over a decade. He is also publisher of No Jitter, the Enterprise Connect community.s daily news and analysis website.
 

Eric served as editor of No Jitter from its founding in 2007 until taking over as publisher in 2015. From 1996 to 2004, Eric was managing editor of Business Communications Review (BCR) magazine, and from 2004 to 2007, he was the magazine's editor. BCR was a highly respected journal of the business technology and communications industry.
 

Before coming to BCR, he was managing editor and senior editor of America's Network magazine, covering the public telecommunications industry. Prior to working in high-tech journalism, he was a reporter and editor at newspapers in Connecticut and Texas.