Sponsored By

Of Telepresence, Presence and "Presence"Of Telepresence, Presence and "Presence"

Here's a really interesting blog post taking on the conventional wisdom about telepresence saving on travel. The blogger, Anthony Townsend, director of the Institute for the Future, notes that if telepresence deployment did in fact reduce the incidence of travel, such a development would be a historical anomaly. (Also see here for a talk Townsend gave at the Institute for the Future last year.)

Eric Krapf

September 9, 2008

2 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

Here's a really interesting blog post taking on the conventional wisdom about telepresence saving on travel. The blogger, Anthony Townsend, director of the Institute for the Future, notes that if telepresence deployment did in fact reduce the incidence of travel, such a development would be a historical anomaly. (Also see here for a talk Townsend gave at the Institute for the Future last year.)

Here's a really interesting blog post taking on the conventional wisdom about telepresence saving on travel. The blogger, Anthony Townsend, director of the Institute for the Future, notes that if telepresence deployment did in fact reduce the incidence of travel, such a development would be a historical anomaly. (Also see here for a talk Townsend gave at the Institute for the Future last year.)In many ways, this is what Cisco and others have been saying all along: Telepresence won't replace in-person meetings, it'll allow for more and better meetings in addition to the in-person get-togethers. (Note that the word "presence" in Townsend's title refers to the old-fashioned definition, as in "being there," not the techno-jargon meaning that we always use it for).

And Townsend, in his longer IFTF talk, uses a telling statistic to highlight the fact that expanding communications technologies have historically expanded the amount of physical travel that takes place:

The Internet is a fundamental part of low-cost airline business models. They are utterly dependent upon the efficiency of Internet bookings, and they are now the biggest driver of expansion in air travel from London to Lahore. For instance, on any given flight of Brazilan low-cost carrier Gol, 1 of every 3 or 4 passengers is flying for the first time ever.

It's a good point. How many dollars and staff-hours have been cut out of business travel and expense reporting thanks to improved software and networked communications? Are there further improvements whose cost savings might offset the increased costs of fuel?

One final note: As an aside, Townsend's opera example is pretty neat. The last time I took my daughter to the movies, there were ads for the Met-at-the-cinema shows, and I thought to myself that it might be something to try--though for the very opposite reason from what Townsend proposes: Not because I want to see if I like the show before I shell out a few hundred bucks and get all dressed up to go to the opera in Chicago, but rather because it just looked like a cool thing to watch in a movie theater.

About the Author

Eric Krapf

Eric Krapf is General Manager and Program Co-Chair for Enterprise Connect, the leading conference/exhibition and online events brand in the enterprise communications industry. He has been Enterprise Connect.s Program Co-Chair for over a decade. He is also publisher of No Jitter, the Enterprise Connect community.s daily news and analysis website.
 

Eric served as editor of No Jitter from its founding in 2007 until taking over as publisher in 2015. From 1996 to 2004, Eric was managing editor of Business Communications Review (BCR) magazine, and from 2004 to 2007, he was the magazine's editor. BCR was a highly respected journal of the business technology and communications industry.
 

Before coming to BCR, he was managing editor and senior editor of America's Network magazine, covering the public telecommunications industry. Prior to working in high-tech journalism, he was a reporter and editor at newspapers in Connecticut and Texas.