Sponsored By

Mandate for IP PBX Vendors: Barge Into Hosted UCMandate for IP PBX Vendors: Barge Into Hosted UC

Mitel may be a role model.

John Malone

January 18, 2018

3 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

The 2018 hosted PBX market is raging. Hundreds of UCaaS providers control 18% of all PBX sales. But for a decade or more, cloud has benched the traditional IP PBX behemoths. Sidelined, they've been searching for a seemingly elusive, viable, hosted PBX go-to-market strategy. Not surprisingly the answer is in plain sight. Just study Mitel, one company that pretty much solved the riddle.

Eastern Management Group research analysts recently completed a four-year study of the hosted market and published the research in a new report, "Worldwide Hosted PBX Market 2017-2022." We present some of our go-to-market analysis in this post, the fifth in an ongoing series.

Mitel, a decades-old traditional PBX manufacturer, would seem an unlikely role model for its outsized competitors. Before hosted, Mitel's average premises PBX customer was an SMB. With an average switch size of 30 to 40 stations, Mitel was easily ignored by competitors with average sales of 80 to 100 stations. But just like the large premises PBX players, Mitel has always had a formidable complement of channel partners. Any one of Mitel's dealers might have sold PBXs for Alcatel-Lucent, Avaya, Cisco, NEC, or Unify, all large switch players that owned the PBX market long before the advent of hosted UC.

Can Premises PBX Channel Partners Sell Hosted UC?
Until Mitel helped to solve the channel partner riddle, no one would believe premises PBX dealers would capably sell hosted PBX. Mostly, that's still the case for the other guys. These are eight lingering antediluvian arguments:

  1. PBX partners don't know how to sell cloud or are afraid of it

  2. PBX partners will continue selling equipment, not UCaaS

  3. Partners must bifurcate the sales force (this office sells PBX equipment, that office sells cloud)

  4. Partners make more in commissions selling premises equipment than cloud

  5. Partners depend on one-time equipment commission checks, not annuities

  6. Vendors must do the selling for their partners, which may then fulfill the orders

  7. The partners just won't do it

  8. New born-in-cloud partners are needed

We know from our consulting practice that each of these theories lack merit. To wit:

  • Partners make more money selling cloud than equipment

  • Partners can and are being trained to sell cloud

  • Partners sell annuities like SIP trunks and maintenance today

  • Partners are successfully selling cloud and premises PBX even to the same customer

Mitel landed a workable go-to-market strategy for selling hosted PBX. How? By deciding that the existing premises PBX channel must sell hosted PBX. Period. The company didn't have sufficient money or time to reinvent the go-to-market wheel. Mitel not only succeeded using existing channel partners, it bought itself time. That's right, a lot of time. At some point, all premises PBX providers will realize the untapped value hidden in their channel partners. That's when the IP PBX companies can barge into the hosted UC market and occupy what probably should be their rightful place.

This is the fifth in an eight-part biweekly series based on research from Eastern Management Group's exhaustive "Worldwide Hosted PBX Market 2017-2022" report. See earlier posts:

For questions about the hosted PBX study please ask Eastern Management Group researchers.

Learn more about Cloud Communications at Enterprise Connect 2018, March 12 to 15, in Orlando, Fla. Register now using the code NOJITTER to save an additional $200 off the Advance Rate -- extended to Friday, Jan. 19 -- or get a free Expo Plus pass.

About the Author

John Malone

John Malone is the President and CEO of The Eastern Management Group. He heads one of the world's premier communications industry research companies. He is also the author of three books.

In addition to Eastern Management, he founded two other software and database management companies. He has served on the board of directors of numerous publicly traded, and private technology companies.

At The Eastern Management Group, he has managed thousands of the company's research assignments for major technology businesses and service providers worldwide.

John Malone is a former executive with AT&T. While there he developed the first call center.

He has advised Members and Staff of The US House of Representatives, US Senate, Department of Justice, FCC, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, State Legislatures, State Regulatory Commissions and the European Commission. He has testified extensively before the US Congress, state legislatures, and regulatory agencies on technology matters. His research and analysis of telecommunications and Internet policy have been presented at the Cato Institute and FreedomWorks.

His insights and views have been frequently reported in The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, and Business Week. Fortune magazine called John Malone the leading analyst in the industry.

John Malone has served on the Board of Directors of American Fiber Systems acquired by Zayo, Valere Power acquired by Eltek Energy, In Motion Technology acquired by Sierra Wireless, Phaethon Communications acquired by TeraXion, Applied Digital Access acquired by Dynatech, VINA Technologies acquired by Larscom, and Larscom acquired by Verilink. He also served on the University of Dayton Alumni Board of Directors. He holds a BS and MBA from the University of Dayton.