Sponsored By

How Much Does SIP Trunking Really Save You?How Much Does SIP Trunking Really Save You?

Is the figure 90%? Or 25%? Something in between? Or is it much less?

Eric Krapf

July 27, 2011

3 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

Is the figure 90%? Or 25%? Something in between? Or is it much less?

One of the things we all know about SIP Trunking is that it saves money. Big money. Maybe 90% savings on your trunking costs when compared with PRIs. We all do know that, right?

There was a brief exchange during an analyst meeting at last week's ShoreTel partner conference that highlighted some differing perspectives on whether SIP Trunking really is a big money-saver. One analyst cited his firm's research showing a 28% savings by moving to SIP Trunks, a figure that sparked a brief discussion--was it too high, not high enough, just right?

In this particular meeting, the issue of SIP Trunking savings was a sidelight, and one that wasn't really pursued. But there is legitimate debate over whether SIP Trunking savings are really as impressive as advertised, once you figure in various costs. Marty Parker says that in his experience doing client work for UniComm Consulting, "By the time all the necessary (redundant/failover) gateways are purchased and then are routed through the (redundant/failover) SBCs, the costs of SIP trunks are on a par with, or maybe 10% less than, traditional large groups of T-1 trunks."

One thing that makes the number I heard at ShoreTel's meeting sound somewhat reasonable is that it jibes with at least the low end of what Sorell Slaymaker's been saying about SIP Trunking savings--Sorell's one of our main SIP Trunking gurus and knows a lot about the real cost impacts of putting in SIP Trunks--i.e., the ripple effects and unforeseen circomustances that can cut into your expected savings. Sorell's latest update on the state of SIP Trunking pegged the potential savings at 25%-60%.

The other factor that will affect SIP Trunking savings is the nature of the contracts that you write with your service provider. These are also in a state of flux, as the incumbent carriers (AT&T and Verizon) go through the cycles of grieving when it comes to cannibalizing a lucrative legacy service with newer, cheaper offerings--a process we’ve seen play out when MPLS replaced frame relay, and in countless other instances over the generations. On this topic, our ace expert is Lisa Pierce of Strategic Networks Group, who's been following the carriers’ enterprise service offerings for years and is the best in the business at helping enterprises understand the ins and outs of these offers.

I'm delighted that Sorell and Lisa will be keynoting our upcoming online session, "SIP Trunking: Making It Happen." We really felt that it was important to focus this event on the realities of SIP Trunking, because enterprises are at the point where they don't need to be convinced to do SIP Trunking; and hopefully their carriers are approaching the Acceptance stage of their grief, and thus are increasingly willing to roll out the services.

So now it's a matter of capturing the maximum possible savings. Sorell’s and Lisa’s keynote will be followed by a series of companion webcasts and will be accompanied by the chance for attendees to learn more about SIP Trunking from our sponsors, Siemens Enterprise Communications and XO Communications.

We hope you'll join us Wednesday, August 17, for what promises to be an informative, useful deep dive into the realities of SIP Trunking. You can find the sign-up for the online presentations here.

About the Author

Eric Krapf

Eric Krapf is General Manager and Program Co-Chair for Enterprise Connect, the leading conference/exhibition and online events brand in the enterprise communications industry. He has been Enterprise Connect.s Program Co-Chair for over a decade. He is also publisher of No Jitter, the Enterprise Connect community.s daily news and analysis website.
 

Eric served as editor of No Jitter from its founding in 2007 until taking over as publisher in 2015. From 1996 to 2004, Eric was managing editor of Business Communications Review (BCR) magazine, and from 2004 to 2007, he was the magazine's editor. BCR was a highly respected journal of the business technology and communications industry.
 

Before coming to BCR, he was managing editor and senior editor of America's Network magazine, covering the public telecommunications industry. Prior to working in high-tech journalism, he was a reporter and editor at newspapers in Connecticut and Texas.