Sponsored By

Forrester on Basic and Enhanced UCForrester on Basic and Enhanced UC

Financial rewards may often be higher with Enhanced UC, and basic UC "is going to be the normal way to communicate in the future."

Eric Krapf

February 18, 2009

3 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

Financial rewards may often be higher with Enhanced UC, and basic UC "is going to be the normal way to communicate in the future."

Forrester Research recently came out with a report, "Market Overview: Sizing Unified Communications," which I wrote a newsletter/blog about this week, touching on the issue of communications-enabled business process. But there were a bunch of other things in the report worth discussing, so I'll tackle those here.I had a chance to talk with Henry Dewing, who wrote the report, about some of his expectations regarding how this market will develop. Forrester divides UC into two variations: Basic and Enhanced. The figure below spells out the distinction:

This breakdown makes a lot of sense to me, and as helpful as all the detailed descriptions are, I almost think that the really useful part is the high-level view you get with each of the categories, characterizing Traditional, Basic and Enhanced, according to how you use each category: "Reach for a unique device;" "Select a path from a unified client;" and "Click to communicate." The interesting thing is that Forrester sees various implementation scenarios in different enterprises, including situations where rollout of enhanced UC--to a focused subset of end users--precedes rollout of basic UC to the wider enterprise. The report estimates that Basic UC--which excludes infrastructure fundamentals like the IP-PBX--will cost $350 per seat, while Enhanced UC will run $600 per seat.

Financial rewards may often be higher with Enhanced UC, according to Henry, and basic UC "is going to be the normal way to communicate in the future." If you go back to those characterizations of Traditional, Basic, and Enhanced, I think that makes sense. Basic UC will eventually be more cost-effective than giving multiple discrete devices, some of which (desk phones) may not get used very much. For $350, if you get all of the functionality shown in the middle column in place of an IP phone (which would probably cost more anyway), that's not a bad tradeoff.

Overall, Henry's projecting that the UC market for North America, Europe and Asia-Pac will grow at a compound annual rate of almost 36% between 2008 and 2015. That would mean a market growing from $1.2 billion last year to $14.5 billion in 2015. Basic UC will represent 2/3 of this 2015 total, according to Forrester.

Clearly, Henry's not projecting this growth to take off real soon; his report notes that the UC marketplace today is dominated by trials rather than deployments, and that "investment dollars are hard to come by" in 2009.

One final note: Kudos to Henry for digging up maybe the only Yogi Berra quote that hasn't been beaten to death; in fact, it's one I'd never heard before: "In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is."Financial rewards may often be higher with Enhanced UC, and basic UC "is going to be the normal way to communicate in the future."

About the Author

Eric Krapf

Eric Krapf is General Manager and Program Co-Chair for Enterprise Connect, the leading conference/exhibition and online events brand in the enterprise communications industry. He has been Enterprise Connect.s Program Co-Chair for over a decade. He is also publisher of No Jitter, the Enterprise Connect community.s daily news and analysis website.
 

Eric served as editor of No Jitter from its founding in 2007 until taking over as publisher in 2015. From 1996 to 2004, Eric was managing editor of Business Communications Review (BCR) magazine, and from 2004 to 2007, he was the magazine's editor. BCR was a highly respected journal of the business technology and communications industry.
 

Before coming to BCR, he was managing editor and senior editor of America's Network magazine, covering the public telecommunications industry. Prior to working in high-tech journalism, he was a reporter and editor at newspapers in Connecticut and Texas.