Sponsored By

700 MHz Winners Announced700 MHz Winners Announced

In my post on the conclusion of the 700 MHz auctions last week I reported the rumor that Google was not among the winners. When the winners were announced two days later, that rumor was indeed confirmed. Now that we've had a couple of days to wade through the results, a few interesting patterns have emerged.

Michael Finneran

March 25, 2008

4 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

In my post on the conclusion of the 700 MHz auctions last week I reported the rumor that Google was not among the winners. When the winners were announced two days later, that rumor was indeed confirmed. Now that we've had a couple of days to wade through the results, a few interesting patterns have emerged.

In my post on the conclusion of the 700 MHz auctions last week I reported the rumor that Google was not among the winners. When the winners were announced two days later, that rumor was indeed confirmed. Now that we've had a couple of days to wade through the results, a few interesting patterns have emerged.The biggest buyers were Verizon and AT&T, the two major cellular carriers. Together they invested $16.27 billion or 83% of the total take. The other national cellular carriers, Sprint and T-Mobile, bought nothing. T-Mobile stocked up on spectrum to the tune of $4.6 billion in the AWS auction in 2006, and Sprint is sitting on a major swath in the 2.5 GHz band that they hope to use to for their mobile WiMAX service- if they can come up with the money to build the network.

However, AT&T and Verizon approached the auctions with very different strategies. AT&T spent $6.64 billion and focused on the restriction-free 12 MHz B Block; they grabbed 227 out of 734 licenses covering areas across the country. AT&T's views on openness seem to reflect the KGB's opinions on glasnost.

Verizon was the biggest spender, dropping a total of $9.63 billion. Roughly half of that went for those restriction-free A and B Block licenses, but they also bagged most of the licenses for the much discussed C Band. The requirement for C Band bidders was "open access", where any network built on these airwaves would have to be open to any device and any application. That requirement was instituted based largely on Google's aggressive lobbying efforts last summer.

While free enterprise may have triumphed, the US Government took it on the chin. The open access and other use restrictions clearly drove down the prices. Verizon got the C Block licenses for $4.75 billion, just 3% above the FCC-defined minimum. The most restrictive licenses were in the D Block, where the winners would have to share that spectrum with public safety agencies. None of the bids received met the FCC-defined $1.3 billion minimum. That spectrum will have to offered again, possibly with a different set of regulations.

The basic measure of radio spectrum value is cost/MHz/Pop, or the cost of 1 MHz of radio spectrum covering a population of 1 million people (you might hear other definitions of that measure, but this is the real one). According to RBC Capital Markets, the average cost per MHz/Pop for the unencumbered A and B Blocks were $1.17 and $2.24 respectively, while the C Block was 76 cents. It seems fairly clear from the C and D Block results that in a market process, encumbrances reduce the value of the asset.

Among the other winners were Dish Networks (bidding as "Frontier Wireless") and Qualcomm. They split the 6 MHz E Block (what used to be UHF channel 56), with Qualcomm buying the major markets and Dish taking the smaller ones. Qualcomm was a winner in one of the earlier 700 MHz auctions when they acquired the nationwide licenses for the 6 MHz that was channel 55, and they are apparently looking to beef up the capacity of their floundering MediaFLO mobile video service.

Conclusion This will probably be the last major spectrum story for a while; the FCC doesn't have much to sell at the moment. While those of us who track the machinations of the wireless industry have been following the 700 MHz saga closely, it will be a couple of years before users see any significant new offerings in the wireless space. The carriers will have to decide what they want to provide, standards for those services will have to be developed, equipment manufacturers will have to build the infrastructure elements, and then we can finally start doing something.

We'll keep you posted on the developments, but you will definitely have time to get your tomato plants in before anything happens on the 700 MHz front.

About the Author

Michael Finneran

Michael F. Finneran, is Principal at dBrn Associates, Inc., a full-service advisory firm specializing in wireless and mobility. With over 40-years experience in networking, Mr. Finneran has become a recognized expert in the field and has assisted clients in a wide range of project assignments spanning service selection, product research, policy development, purchase analysis, and security/technology assessment. The practice addresses both an industry analyst role with vendors as well as serving as a consultant to end users, a combination that provides an in-depth perspective on the industry.

His expertise spans the full range of wireless technologies including Wi-Fi, 3G/4G/5G Cellular and IoT network services as well as fixed wireless, satellite, RFID and Land Mobile Radio (LMR)/first responder communications. Along with a deep understanding of the technical challenges, he also assists clients with the business aspects of mobility including mobile security, policy and vendor comparisons. Michael has provided assistance to carriers, equipment manufacturers, investment firms, and end users in a variety of industry and government verticals. He recently led the technical evaluation for one of the largest cellular contracts in the U.S.

As a byproduct of his consulting assignments, Michael has become a fixture within the industry. He has appeared at hundreds of trade shows and industry conferences, and helps plan the Mobility sessions at Enterprise Connect. Since his first piece in 1980, he has published over 1,000 articles in NoJitter, BCStrategies, InformationWeek, Computerworld, Channel Partners and Business Communications Review, the print predecessor to No Jitter.

Mr. Finneran has conducted over 2,000 seminars on networking topics in the U.S. and around the world, and was an Adjunct Professor in the Graduate Telecommunications Program at Pace University. Along with his technical credentials, Michael holds a Masters Degree in Management from the J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.