Sponsored By

WiMAX Delayed and Discarded at CTIAWiMAX Delayed and Discarded at CTIA

Going into the CTIA Wireless show in Las Vegas last week, it appeared that Sprint's beleaguered Xohm WiMAX service might finally be getting some impetus. The Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post both reported on rumors that Comcast and Time Warner were considering making investments totaling $1.5 billion in Xohm. Intel Capital and Google have long been rumored to be interested investors, so financially-strapped Sprint might finally have the funding it needs to get its WiMAX project back on the track. There was speculation that Sprint was working behind the scenes to close a deal so that CEO Dan Hesse could announce it in his keynote address at the show.

Michael Finneran

April 7, 2008

4 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

Going into the CTIA Wireless show in Las Vegas last week, it appeared that Sprint's beleaguered Xohm WiMAX service might finally be getting some impetus. The Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post both reported on rumors that Comcast and Time Warner were considering making investments totaling $1.5 billion in Xohm. Intel Capital and Google have long been rumored to be interested investors, so financially-strapped Sprint might finally have the funding it needs to get its WiMAX project back on the track. There was speculation that Sprint was working behind the scenes to close a deal so that CEO Dan Hesse could announce it in his keynote address at the show.

Going into the CTIA Wireless show in Las Vegas last week, it appeared that Sprint's beleaguered Xohm WiMAX service might finally be getting some impetus. The Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post both reported on rumors that Comcast and Time Warner were considering making investments totaling $1.5 billion in Xohm. Intel Capital and Google have long been rumored to be interested investors, so financially-strapped Sprint might finally have the funding it needs to get its WiMAX project back on the track. There was speculation that Sprint was working behind the scenes to close a deal so that CEO Dan Hesse could announce it in his keynote address at the show.CTIA Wireless is the major event for the cellular industry, but the show came and went with no big news from Sprint on WiMAX. In spite of Hesse's optimistic plug for WiMAX during the keynote on Monday, the only thing Sprint had to announce were additions to the "WiMAX Ecosystem"; that means more gadgets to connect to the network that doesn't exist. By week's end, Sprint was disclosing to reporters that Xohm would not meet itsplanned April rollout date. That means we can probably forget about their earlier promise to cover 100 million people by the end of 2008.

Sprint spokesman James Fisher noted, "The change in rollout is not related to the technology." There were random reports about problems securing backhaul facilities, and a possible shift in direction to femtocells, but it sounded like Sprint was purposely muddying the waters. So our hopes of a real alternative to cellular for wide area wireless service in the US seem to be dimming by the hour.

If that wasn't enough bad news on the WiMAX front, Australian carrier Buzz Broadband, one of the first carriers to deploy a network that would be based on WiMAX-certified equipment, trashed the technology in a presentation at the WiMAX World Asia 2008 conference in Bangkok. Garth Freeman, Buzz's CEO, blasted the technology for failing to deliver the service it promised and being "mired in opportunistic hype." Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) performance was "non-existent" beyond two kilometers, indoor performance decayed at just 400 meters, and latency climbed to 1 second, making the technology unusable for VoIP. Freeman said his company is ditching WiMAX and will be replacing it with other wireless technologies. Buzz's equipment supplier, Airspan, countered that Buzz had bought their shorter-range, lower-cost product line.

Toward the close of the CTIA Wireless show, the FCC gag order came off, and the winners of the 700 MHz frequency auctions were free to describe their plans for service in the spectrum they acquired. Not surprisingly, the two major winners, Verizon and AT&T, are both looking at deploying services based on the Long Term Evolution (LTE), the cellular 4G standard. Neither vision included any mention of WiMAX. They did make it clear that we should not be anticipating any new services before 2010, and given the wireless industry's track record regarding new service rollouts, you can safely tack two or three years onto that prediction.

The most interesting comment came from AT&T Wireless' CEO Ralph de la Vaga, who was quoted in the Wall Street Journal saying that the spectrum AT&T acquired was more valuable as it was "not encumbered" by open platform conditions like the C Block frequencies that Verizon bought; that jibes with the observation I made regarding spectrum valuation. So it appears that the cellular carriers will bring their penchant for "walled garden" wireless solutions into the fourth generation, and that does not bode well for flexible mobile unified communications.

About the Author

Michael Finneran

Michael F. Finneran, is Principal at dBrn Associates, Inc., a full-service advisory firm specializing in wireless and mobility. With over 40-years experience in networking, Mr. Finneran has become a recognized expert in the field and has assisted clients in a wide range of project assignments spanning service selection, product research, policy development, purchase analysis, and security/technology assessment. The practice addresses both an industry analyst role with vendors as well as serving as a consultant to end users, a combination that provides an in-depth perspective on the industry.

His expertise spans the full range of wireless technologies including Wi-Fi, 3G/4G/5G Cellular and IoT network services as well as fixed wireless, satellite, RFID and Land Mobile Radio (LMR)/first responder communications. Along with a deep understanding of the technical challenges, he also assists clients with the business aspects of mobility including mobile security, policy and vendor comparisons. Michael has provided assistance to carriers, equipment manufacturers, investment firms, and end users in a variety of industry and government verticals. He recently led the technical evaluation for one of the largest cellular contracts in the U.S.

As a byproduct of his consulting assignments, Michael has become a fixture within the industry. He has appeared at hundreds of trade shows and industry conferences, and helps plan the Mobility sessions at Enterprise Connect. Since his first piece in 1980, he has published over 1,000 articles in NoJitter, BCStrategies, InformationWeek, Computerworld, Channel Partners and Business Communications Review, the print predecessor to No Jitter.

Mr. Finneran has conducted over 2,000 seminars on networking topics in the U.S. and around the world, and was an Adjunct Professor in the Graduate Telecommunications Program at Pace University. Along with his technical credentials, Michael holds a Masters Degree in Management from the J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.