Sponsored By

SPIT Pre-EmptionSPIT Pre-Emption

Once again via the invaluable VOIPSA , comes word that some IETF members are exploring a more formal effort to pre-emptively deal with the nascent problem of SPIT (spam over IP telephony), with a proposed BoF session at the next IETF meeting. Enterprises and their vendors should support any effort to have defenses in place for this next generation of spam.

Eric Krapf

February 4, 2008

2 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

Once again via the invaluable VOIPSA, comes word that some IETF members are exploring a more formal effort to pre-emptively deal with the nascent problem of SPIT (spam over IP telephony), with a proposed BoF session at the next IETF meeting. Enterprises and their vendors should support any effort to have defenses in place for this next generation of spam.

Once again via the invaluable VOIPSA, comes word that some IETF members are exploring a more formal effort to pre-emptively deal with the nascent problem of SPIT (spam over IP telephony), with a proposed BoF session at the next IETF meeting. Enterprises and their vendors should support any effort to have defenses in place for this next generation of spam.I keep harping on this topic because, unlike a lot of the VOIP security issues you hear about, it really does seem like just a matter of time until spam crosses the species barrier into voice. Why wouldn't it, especially if it can be done in such a way as to evade current laws, and--more importantly--if nobody is ready for it, just as nobody was ready for email spam in the beginning.

And as several security experts have pointed out, filtering voice spam is even harder, because the filtering decision has to be made in real time. And even more troubling, if voice is going to become a crucial component of mission-critical business applications, as the Unified Communications vision suggests, real-time networks can't afford to be crippled by the kind of resource diversion/consumption that unchecked spam represents.

To me, this is one problem that it's hard to underestimate. The scary stories about man-in-the-middle attacks, where somebody injects packets to alter a conversation, or captures secret data--those attacks might happen, but the companies most at risk probably are most ahead of the curve in dealing with it: Financial firms and the like. Voice spam has the potential to affect everyone, which is exactly why it's so appealing to the spammers in the first place.

Rather than waiting until the problem becomes another massive drain on networks and productivity, the industry should build pre-emptive defenses against voice spam.

About the Author

Eric Krapf

Eric Krapf is General Manager and Program Co-Chair for Enterprise Connect, the leading conference/exhibition and online events brand in the enterprise communications industry. He has been Enterprise Connect.s Program Co-Chair for over a decade. He is also publisher of No Jitter, the Enterprise Connect community.s daily news and analysis website.
 

Eric served as editor of No Jitter from its founding in 2007 until taking over as publisher in 2015. From 1996 to 2004, Eric was managing editor of Business Communications Review (BCR) magazine, and from 2004 to 2007, he was the magazine's editor. BCR was a highly respected journal of the business technology and communications industry.
 

Before coming to BCR, he was managing editor and senior editor of America's Network magazine, covering the public telecommunications industry. Prior to working in high-tech journalism, he was a reporter and editor at newspapers in Connecticut and Texas.