Sponsored By

My IP Phone Will Go OnMy IP Phone Will Go On

Here's a VoiceCon eNews newsletter I did a couple of weeks back. Basically, I was arguing that the IP telephone desk set market would be a kind of transitional, comparatively short-lived market.

Eric Krapf

February 15, 2008

2 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

Here's a VoiceCon eNews newsletter I did a couple of weeks back. Basically, I was arguing that the IP telephone desk set market would be a kind of transitional, comparatively short-lived market.

Here's a VoiceCon eNews newsletter I did a couple of weeks back. Basically, I was arguing that the IP telephone desk set market would be a kind of transitional, comparatively short-lived market.In that newsletter I quoted from Allan Sulkin's Market Review article in the Feature section of this website, and added my own thoughts:

Thanks to the one-two punch of mobile phones and Unified Communications clients/PC softphones, "The days of ubiquitous $500 desktop telephones for professional white collar workers are slowly fading into oblivion," Allan writes.

In response to that newsletter, I heard from our friend Hardy Myers, CEO of AVST, who questioned Allan's projection about a 2009 crossover of the installed base to IP, but who also made a case for an enduring IP phone market, at least at the low end:

Referring to the data from our webinar in November (see below) and based upon ongoing conversations with many, many enterprise customers, I really doubt the installed base of IP Phones will exceed the TDM phones by 2009. I believe that the combination of MS [Microsoft] and FMC are going to slow down the "Cool and Expensive" IPT Phone deployments - which is why Cisco, Avaya and Nortel are in trouble. However, when you can put a good reasonable featured "white box" IP Phone on the desk for under $100 (in the near MS future), why wouldn't they upgrade in the future anyway? I would always much rather have a call to a desk phone if I am in the office then to a cell or soft phone.

This is the data that Hardy refers to as (below):

I agree with Hardy on this, but I think it's almost a distinction without a difference. The $100-a-set telephone market is not one that Avaya, Cisco and Nortel want to be in; if the high-end sets become a niche market (and if by high end we now mean anything that costs more than $100 and does more than just a few basic things), then that does sap a major revenue stream for the "voice" vendors. So from the big-vendor perspective, a $100 desk set is essentially no desk set at all.

Hardy also made one other point that I've advocated for:

One final comment for you to consider - If AT&T (and Verizon) get the FMC thing really right, the PBX manufacturers and MS could both be in trouble - Virtual PBX in the Sky! Once again the network wins except this time it will be wireless instead of wireline.

I totally agree, though that's one of the biggest "Ifs" ever....

About the Author

Eric Krapf

Eric Krapf is General Manager and Program Co-Chair for Enterprise Connect, the leading conference/exhibition and online events brand in the enterprise communications industry. He has been Enterprise Connect.s Program Co-Chair for over a decade. He is also publisher of No Jitter, the Enterprise Connect community.s daily news and analysis website.
 

Eric served as editor of No Jitter from its founding in 2007 until taking over as publisher in 2015. From 1996 to 2004, Eric was managing editor of Business Communications Review (BCR) magazine, and from 2004 to 2007, he was the magazine's editor. BCR was a highly respected journal of the business technology and communications industry.
 

Before coming to BCR, he was managing editor and senior editor of America's Network magazine, covering the public telecommunications industry. Prior to working in high-tech journalism, he was a reporter and editor at newspapers in Connecticut and Texas.