Sponsored By

How Present Does Presence Need to Be?How Present Does Presence Need to Be?

Here's an interesting issue that came up in a podcast interview I did this morning with Paul Lopez, who's GM, Marketing at NEC Unified Solutions. NEC recently made its Univerge 360 announcement around Unified Communications, and in the course of a UC-focused conversation, Paul and I eventually got around to the topic of presence.

Eric Krapf

March 17, 2008

2 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

Here's an interesting issue that came up in a podcast interview I did this morning with Paul Lopez, who's GM, Marketing at NEC Unified Solutions. NEC recently made its Univerge 360 announcement around Unified Communications, and in the course of a UC-focused conversation, Paul and I eventually got around to the topic of presence.

Here's an interesting issue that came up in a podcast interview I did this morning with Paul Lopez, who's GM, Marketing at NEC Unified Solutions. NEC recently made its Univerge 360 announcement around Unified Communications, and in the course of a UC-focused conversation, Paul and I eventually got around to the topic of presence.Opinions seem to vary about the importance of presence in UC. From an architectural standpoint, it pretty clearly has to sit at the core of the network, but does that mean its functionality is core to the success of a UC deployment?

The element of the discussion that Paul introduced in this morning's conversation was the efficacy of presence--in other words, if you have a global network with, say, 100,000 users on it, can presence really work the same way it does with your Yahoo buddy list of a dozen or so names?

The technical concerns, Paul suggested, are network latency (in the case of global networks, at least), and just the ability of your existing Active Directory or other directory services infrastructure to handle the new, likely much increased, workload.

I'd be surprised if anyone could give you, today, an answer to this question that you could take to the bank. The kind of full-scale presence that UC contemplates must represent a whole new level of demand on the directory services as well as the underlying network, in terms of capacity and performance.

The good news, Paul said, may be that you can offer some streamlined presence capabilities for global implementations--do you really need to know the exact status of a colleague's communications channels, or is some less granular function sufficient?

I'd appreciate hearing your thoughts, especially on the technical issues Paul raises.

About the Author

Eric Krapf

Eric Krapf is General Manager and Program Co-Chair for Enterprise Connect, the leading conference/exhibition and online events brand in the enterprise communications industry. He has been Enterprise Connect.s Program Co-Chair for over a decade. He is also publisher of No Jitter, the Enterprise Connect community.s daily news and analysis website.
 

Eric served as editor of No Jitter from its founding in 2007 until taking over as publisher in 2015. From 1996 to 2004, Eric was managing editor of Business Communications Review (BCR) magazine, and from 2004 to 2007, he was the magazine's editor. BCR was a highly respected journal of the business technology and communications industry.
 

Before coming to BCR, he was managing editor and senior editor of America's Network magazine, covering the public telecommunications industry. Prior to working in high-tech journalism, he was a reporter and editor at newspapers in Connecticut and Texas.