Sponsored By

Wireless HDTV Interface at 60 GHzWireless HDTV Interface at 60 GHz

The Consumer Electronics show will be in Las Vegas next week, and one of the surprise announcements is that an industry consortium will be displaying a short-range, wireless HDTV interface. Called WirelessHD , the consortium includes Sony, NEC, Toshiba, LG, and Intel, and will be using a new brand of wireless technology.

Michael Finneran

January 4, 2008

2 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

The Consumer Electronics show will be in Las Vegas next week, and one of the surprise announcements is that an industry consortium will be displaying a short-range, wireless HDTV interface. Called WirelessHD, the consortium includes Sony, NEC, Toshiba, LG, and Intel, and will be using a new brand of wireless technology.

The Consumer Electronics show will be in Las Vegas next week, and one of the surprise announcements is that an industry consortium will be displaying a short-range, wireless HDTV interface. Called WirelessHD, the consortium includes Sony, NEC, Toshiba, LG, and Intel, and will be using a new brand of wireless technology.The WirelessHD interface is designed to clean up a good part of that rat's nest of cables that lurks behind your home entertainment system. Primarily it is intended to replace the High-Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) used to connect set-top boxes, DVD and DVR units to high definition TV displays; in Wireless HD, the devices actually form a small wireless LAN with a controller. The first generation Wireless HD specification supports data rates up to 4 Gbps, though the technology can theoretically support rates as high as 25 Gbps. That will support uncompressed audio and video at up to 1080p resolution and 24 bit color at 60 Hz refresh rates.

The unique feature of the radio interface is that it operates in the unlicensed 60-GHz band; in North America there is about 7 GHz available between 57 and 64 GHz. Japan has a similar allocation in a slightly different range (59 to 66 GHz), and the EU regulators are considering a similar allocation. Designers have steered clear of the 60-GHz band up until now for a variety of reasons:

* Higher frequency signals lose power more rapidly

* At 60 GHz, oxygen in the atmosphere absorbs some of the energy, further increasing signal loss

* Higher frequency radio signals travel in a linear path normally requiring line of sight between transmitter and receiver

* Up until a few years ago, 60 GHz transmitters could only be built from exotic materials rather than cheap and abundant silicon

As the Wireless HD interface is short-range (up to about 10m), the signal loss is not an issue, and actually helps limit interference with systems in neighboring apartments or homes. Smart beam-forming antenna technology allows non-line of sight operation, and silicon fabrication should make the transmitters cost effective. There is also a built-in security mechanism to appease the content providers.

While primarily a consumer electronics interface, it's only a matter of time before this interface is incorporated in telepresence systems, making them cheaper to install and potentially more portable. I just wish they had this before I drilled all those holes through the wall of my den.

About the Author

Michael Finneran

Michael F. Finneran, is Principal at dBrn Associates, Inc., a full-service advisory firm specializing in wireless and mobility. With over 40-years experience in networking, Mr. Finneran has become a recognized expert in the field and has assisted clients in a wide range of project assignments spanning service selection, product research, policy development, purchase analysis, and security/technology assessment. The practice addresses both an industry analyst role with vendors as well as serving as a consultant to end users, a combination that provides an in-depth perspective on the industry.

His expertise spans the full range of wireless technologies including Wi-Fi, 3G/4G/5G Cellular and IoT network services as well as fixed wireless, satellite, RFID and Land Mobile Radio (LMR)/first responder communications. Along with a deep understanding of the technical challenges, he also assists clients with the business aspects of mobility including mobile security, policy and vendor comparisons. Michael has provided assistance to carriers, equipment manufacturers, investment firms, and end users in a variety of industry and government verticals. He recently led the technical evaluation for one of the largest cellular contracts in the U.S.

As a byproduct of his consulting assignments, Michael has become a fixture within the industry. He has appeared at hundreds of trade shows and industry conferences, and helps plan the Mobility sessions at Enterprise Connect. Since his first piece in 1980, he has published over 1,000 articles in NoJitter, BCStrategies, InformationWeek, Computerworld, Channel Partners and Business Communications Review, the print predecessor to No Jitter.

Mr. Finneran has conducted over 2,000 seminars on networking topics in the U.S. and around the world, and was an Adjunct Professor in the Graduate Telecommunications Program at Pace University. Along with his technical credentials, Michael holds a Masters Degree in Management from the J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.