Sponsored By

Is Your IT Organization Ready for UC?Is Your IT Organization Ready for UC?

We asked that simple question in yesterday's VoiceCon webinar , allowing the audience respondents to decide for themselves what UC meant and was going to entail in their enterprise. The question--whatever UC will be in your company, is your IT organization ready for it? The answer, based on 97 responses: 60% said no. To me, that almost seemed low, given how nascent a technology UC is, and how sparsely deployed. In fact, according to data presented by one of the webinar speakers, Sandra Palumbo of Yankee Group, many companies are still learning about IP telephony.

Eric Krapf

May 22, 2008

2 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

We asked that simple question in yesterday's VoiceCon webinar, allowing the audience respondents to decide for themselves what UC meant and was going to entail in their enterprise. The question--whatever UC will be in your company, is your IT organization ready for it? The answer, based on 97 responses: 60% said no. To me, that almost seemed low, given how nascent a technology UC is, and how sparsely deployed. In fact, according to data presented by one of the webinar speakers, Sandra Palumbo of Yankee Group, many companies are still learning about IP telephony.

We asked that simple question in yesterday's VoiceCon webinar, allowing the audience respondents to decide for themselves what UC meant and was going to entail in their enterprise. The question--whatever UC will be in your company, is your IT organization ready for it? The answer, based on 97 responses: 60% said no. To me, that almost seemed low, given how nascent a technology UC is, and how sparsely deployed. In fact, according to data presented by one of the webinar speakers, Sandra Palumbo of Yankee Group, many companies are still learning about IP telephony.Sandra presented Yankee Group research showing that just over half of respondents feel "somewhat capable" of supporting IPT. As you can see from the figure below, the biggest concerns are around end user training and security. I'd call out that third item, Change Management, as possibly the sleeper issue, because IPT certainly brings about a lot of change.

Yankee Group asked the survey group which tasks they called in professional services to help with, and as you can see below, security was the second highest. I think it's interesting that about 1/3 used professional services in business case development/TCO analysis; I'd be interested to see if this actually translated into better TCO and ROI. As we learned from Robin Gareiss of Nemertes in a previous webinar, there must be diligent followup if you're going to realize the opex benefits that IPT is supposed to bring.

Interestingly, Sandra Palumbo and Yankee Group found less than 10% of their respondents used or will use no professional services whatsoever:

We've talked a lot about how the IPT replacement process has been very incremental, and how this is mostly due to enterprises' reluctance to get rid of fully functional TDM systems. But clearly the process of getting the organization ready for IPT is also moving incrementally. My guess is that this is effect rather than cause: Organizations aren't getting ready for IPT until their companies actually are about to implement it.

About the Author

Eric Krapf

Eric Krapf is General Manager and Program Co-Chair for Enterprise Connect, the leading conference/exhibition and online events brand in the enterprise communications industry. He has been Enterprise Connect.s Program Co-Chair for over a decade. He is also publisher of No Jitter, the Enterprise Connect community.s daily news and analysis website.
 

Eric served as editor of No Jitter from its founding in 2007 until taking over as publisher in 2015. From 1996 to 2004, Eric was managing editor of Business Communications Review (BCR) magazine, and from 2004 to 2007, he was the magazine's editor. BCR was a highly respected journal of the business technology and communications industry.
 

Before coming to BCR, he was managing editor and senior editor of America's Network magazine, covering the public telecommunications industry. Prior to working in high-tech journalism, he was a reporter and editor at newspapers in Connecticut and Texas.