Sponsored By

Salesforce Ditches Most Android PhonesSalesforce Ditches Most Android Phones

Along with making a statement about the state of Android, Salesforce might be giving us a new way to look at the smartphone market. Will UC vendors follow their lead?

Michael Finneran

July 26, 2016

4 Min Read
No Jitter logo in a gray background | No Jitter

Along with making a statement about the state of Android, Salesforce might be giving us a new way to look at the smartphone market. Will UC vendors follow their lead?

In another testament to the wild world of Android, Salesforce.com recently announced it would end technical support, bug fixes, and enhancements for Salesforce1 on all but a few Android devices later this year.

Apparently fed up with the variety of Android implementations, the company said the only Android devices it will support are the Samsung Galaxy S5, S6 and S7, Samsung Galaxy Note 4, and Google Nexus 5X and Google Nexus 6P phones, as well as the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 and the Tab A 9.7 tablets. In the same notice, Salesforce said it is pulling support for some older Apple models, including the iPhone 5 and 5C. Users can still install Salesforce on the unsupported devices, but the company won't provide support for those devices or provide fixes for any bugs that appear.


Source: Google

Given the lackluster adoption of Android in the enterprise, you get the feeling that Salesforce is taking the position that the mess of Android implementations is just too much to deal with. It has long been the case that Apple iOS devices dominate in the enterprise, with Apple's market share estimated at between 70% to 90%. Android's weak acceptance in the enterprise is something of an anomaly, as it clearly dominates in the overall smartphone market. IDC puts Android's worldwide market share at 83% to iOS's 14%.

In a recent InfoWorld piece, "Why Android hasn't beaten Apple in business," my friend Galen Gruman, executive editor (never one to shy away from a strong position), rolls through a litany of problems from continuing security concerns, a lack of business apps, and, of course, the mess created by the wide variety of Android versions in circulation. It's not like we haven't been through this before. I remember the days when working with Windows Phone meant every app description had to include a list of the specific device models on which it would run. Microsoft put an end to such foolishness when it moved from Windows Mobile to Windows 10 Mobile.

Clearly, Apple's strategy of maintaining direct contact with iOS users through iTunes has been one of the keys to its success. Apple deploys each new version of iOS on the vast majority of devices within a month -- even if the first version of the release includes a pile of bugs that need fixing within a week. Android device manufacturers are notoriously slow in deciding which models will get an update and then the carriers have to sign off before the upgrades can occur. The problem for CIOs and chief security officers is that a significant percentage of their Android users could be running those earlier (and typically less secure) versions for years.

Salesforce did make a smart choice in focusing on Google Nexus and Samsung Galaxy models. With its backing from Google, Nexus devices have long delivered the best and least encumbered Android experience. And in regards to Samsung, it is the worldwide leader in sales for Android devices and is strongest at the high end of the market. It has done the most to address the ongoing security concerns with Android, particularly with its Knox security platform. Knox addresses the malware problem with a secure boot process that ties to the device hardware, a practice BlackBerry started and Apple continued.

With its support on dozens of manufacturers' devices and open approach to developers, Android is a unique case study. In any event, you can't argue with success -- and an 83% overall market share is a strong testimonial to that. Of course, that percentage is inflated with low-end devices sold in developing countries, with many of those devices lacking key enterprise requirements like crypto chips that make full device encryption with acceptable performance a possibility.

We will, no doubt, see other app developers copy Salesforce's approach. This will include UC vendors, though the presence of their mobile clients on smartphones has been negligible.

In the bigger picture, this might be the start of another partition in the smartphone market. Rather than dividing the market by operating system as we do today, the new dividing line might be business-capable versus low-end consumer-focused devices. In specifying Android devices for enterprise use, either corporate liable or BYOD supported, mobility managers will need to take a more granular look at the device models that make the cut. That's good news for Samsung, but not so good for others.

Follow Michael Finneran on Twitter and Google+!
@dBrnWireless
Michael Finneran on Google+

About the Author

Michael Finneran

Michael F. Finneran, is Principal at dBrn Associates, Inc., a full-service advisory firm specializing in wireless and mobility. With over 40-years experience in networking, Mr. Finneran has become a recognized expert in the field and has assisted clients in a wide range of project assignments spanning service selection, product research, policy development, purchase analysis, and security/technology assessment. The practice addresses both an industry analyst role with vendors as well as serving as a consultant to end users, a combination that provides an in-depth perspective on the industry.

His expertise spans the full range of wireless technologies including Wi-Fi, 3G/4G/5G Cellular and IoT network services as well as fixed wireless, satellite, RFID and Land Mobile Radio (LMR)/first responder communications. Along with a deep understanding of the technical challenges, he also assists clients with the business aspects of mobility including mobile security, policy and vendor comparisons. Michael has provided assistance to carriers, equipment manufacturers, investment firms, and end users in a variety of industry and government verticals. He recently led the technical evaluation for one of the largest cellular contracts in the U.S.

As a byproduct of his consulting assignments, Michael has become a fixture within the industry. He has appeared at hundreds of trade shows and industry conferences, and helps plan the Mobility sessions at Enterprise Connect. Since his first piece in 1980, he has published over 1,000 articles in NoJitter, BCStrategies, InformationWeek, Computerworld, Channel Partners and Business Communications Review, the print predecessor to No Jitter.

Mr. Finneran has conducted over 2,000 seminars on networking topics in the U.S. and around the world, and was an Adjunct Professor in the Graduate Telecommunications Program at Pace University. Along with his technical credentials, Michael holds a Masters Degree in Management from the J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.