Sponsored By

Cisco Cognitive Collaboration: Where AI Meets 'Marketing'Cisco Cognitive Collaboration: Where AI Meets 'Marketing'

AI is in its infancy as far as enterprise IT is concerned, and buyers are going to have to learn how to separate the meat from the marketing.

Michael Finneran

April 1, 2019

8 Min Read
Marketing

You only have to read the business press to recognize that interest in artificial intelligence (AI) is booming, and companies are itching to capitalize on it. The downside of that is that the marketing departments in our enterprise network vendors have made that same connection and are doing all manner of contortions to associate their offerings with AI.

In the enterprise communications business, we can see three primary areas where AI might have an impact: core infrastructure, contact center, and lastly, unified communications and collaboration (UC&C). Core infrastructure generates volumes of performance, security, and outage data, and AI could conceivably augment our current performance reports, trouble ticket analyses, and log reviews. 

For the contact center and related customer experiences, as there is real money to be made, the business of deriving actionable marketing intelligence from location data, Web activity, and contact center information is already well developed, and is clearly running up against privacy boundaries. Most of those capabilities are highly refined, but they seem to be coming from outside of the contact center business.

The impact of AI for UC&C is more of a stretch, yet that’s what Cisco touted last month with “cognitive collaboration" during its keynote at Enterprise Connect 2019. While there were fleeting references to contact center and network diagnostics, Cisco was clearly trying to make the questionable leap from UC&C to AI. The result left me scratching my head about the relevance of this exercise.

 

Same Clowns, New Circus

I’m particularly sensitive to the idea of incorporating leading-edge buzzwords into meaningless marketing blabber -- I’ve seen it so many times. Remember 10 years back when “mobile” was all the rage and every vendor took pains to market itself as being “mobile first?”

At that time, the UC&C camp was trying to associate itself with the exploding popularity of the iPhone and vendors made valiant attempts to insinuate that what they were offering had something to do with that. In reality, what they were pitching (and demoing during every Enterprise Connect keynote) was a dead-end solution for “integrating with UC.”

That idea took the form of a mobile app for your smartphone to do what your phone already did: Make phone calls. The difference was that the UC&C approach offered a more annoying and intrusive way to do it. While a few vendors at EC19 were still flogging that dead horse, most have acknowledged that the horse is indeed… dead.

 

The Birth of Team Collaboration

With cognitive collaboration, Cisco is again reaching for this same playbook, only this time the image-enhancing insinuation involves AI -- a good buzzword, to be sure. As team collaboration tools proliferate, differentiating one from another is becoming more difficult. In the end, you can call it whatever you want, but it gets down to the old idea of trying to sell what you have (in Cisco’s case, the intellectual property acquired with “relationship intelligence” company, Accompany), rather than looking at what business users might possibly want or need.

Team collaboration is an interesting amalgam of old and new ideas. Vendors have combined audio conferencing, video conferencing, screen sharing, and persistent chat. Companies like Slack and Atlassian pioneered this persistent chat idea (the latter which subsequently sold its technology to Slack and exited the market). With an increasingly communications-rich platform, Slack is a dominant force, on a collision course with the likes of Cisco, not to mention Microsoft, Avaya, Mitel, and any of the growing legion of pure-play UCaaS providers. At the same time, these companies are now being challenged by new entrants like Zoom, which cut its teeth in the cloud video space and is now offering voice, too.

Each of these segments has its particular strength, and as the legacy PBX providers continue to move beyond their “desk phone” personas, they face increasing challenges from upstarts -- including but not limited to Slack in the chat space and Zoom in video and screen sharing. Many of the incremental differences are lost on buyers, so the need to “stand out from the crowd” intensifies. Enter cognitive collaboration.

Click below to continue reading on next page

Cognitive What?

The ebullient Amy Chang, Cisco’s SVP for the Collaboration Technology Group, delivered such a good performance in her first Enterprise Connect keynote, you could almost ignore the fact that what she was saying was utter nonsense. Some of the capabilities like facial recognition and active framing have value, though calling these “AI” is a stretch in itself. Using facial recognition to put “nametags” under people’s images is a nice touch, if only for the first five minutes, after which they should lose the nametags. Cisco’s Oslo team comically demonstrated the system’s ability to recognize you when you put on glasses or a wig, but that has become an expectation in facial recognition today.

The big capability Cisco showcased was a Web-driven tool to collect background information on meeting participants and present it in summary form to the organizer prior to the meeting. Chang came to Cisco from Accompany, which Cisco acquired in 2018. Cisco has now incorporated Accompany’s profiling technology into Webex to create cognitive collaboration. As in many of these cases, the core questions now become, “Why?” and “For Whom?”

I had sat through a briefing on this offering before and had read about it here on No Jitter, but the whole idea sounded so ill-conceived that I really hadn’t bothered to give it much thought. The concept is to provide a Web-crafted profile of a someone you’re going to meet, presumably for the first time, on video. In her keynote, Chang went to great lengths to point out how this profile is superior to one provided via LinkedIn, enhanced as it is with “publicly available, privacy respectful” information scoured from the Web.

That profile would include general background, recent postings, blogs, article mentions, and corporate affiliations with links to detailed information about those companies.

I must admit I got the biggest chuckle from the examples cited, David Soloman, CEO of Goldman Sachs, and Pat Woertz, CEO of Archer Daniels Midland. It goes without saying that high-profile people like these two would have extensive Web presence. Of course, these aren’t the people me or most anyone in the audience would be meeting with on a regular basis.

The vast majority of the people we meet with haven’t published anything (well I have, but I don’t make a big deal about that in my consulting practice). Our contacts are mentioned almost nowhere, and their professional careers and credentials are summarized quite adequately on LinkedIn. Mission accomplished.

Of course, if any of us had the opportunity to meet with someone of Soloman’s or Woertz’s stature, we’d be doing a ton more background preparation than a two-minute quick read of a Web-created brief. People with whom Soloman and Woertz normally interface, that is, people far more senior than we, will have minions for gathering background -- and they’d typically have access to more personal information sources than available via the Web.

So as near as I can tell, this is a swell capability with no defined target market -- and that’s called a “marketing demo.” Just like we saw with the mobile-first movement of 10 years ago, this is a well-orchestrated “show,” designed to create a positive image of the company and to demonstrate a vision -- regardless of how misdirected it might be. To Chang’s credit, she gave a top-notch performance, and even included a heart-warming, though largely tangential, vignette about a sick child.

 

…But, There’s More To Come!

Good showmanship dictates that when you’re opening with a turkey, it’s important to allude to a more useful, non-turkey, capability for the future. In this case, that non-turkey involved the contact center -- you’ve got to touch all the bases.

If the argument for the profiles was tenuous to begin with, the follow-on was more tenuous still. Starting from an inscrutable graphic representation of the career achievements of recent Stanford University graduates (another population far removed from the audience but a nod to Chang’s alma mater), she launched a hypothesis about how this could translate into benefits in the contact center.

The key element left unexplained was how scouring Web content you could somehow allow marketers to go beyond a customer’s lifetime value to their potential value. The slippery part was how you would get to that while maintaining that commitment to “publicly available, privacy respectful” sources. Short answer: nonsense now, less sense going forward.

Conclusion: Can we bring the hot air balloon back to earth?

Twice during her keynote, Chang made reference to “customers, partners, and analysts,” and even included testimonials from Ford, Procter & Gamble, and Splunk. The “analyst” reference is what really caught my attention, because that endorsement appears to be key in giving this silly parlor trick some kind of legitimacy. Don’t count me in.

I’m sorry but this kind of silliness not only lacks value, it distracts from our real purpose: To wit, delivering capabilities that business users can employ to make themselves more efficient, connected, productive, and, ultimately, successful.

Ironically, there were some real innovations on display that would fall into line with what users are looking for. Microsoft, Google, and Zoom all showed real-time transcription and closed captioning. Microsoft not only showed closed captioning, but also real-time translation. Now that’s a head-turner and one step short of Douglas Adams’ Babel Fish. Zoom puts its transcription in a sidebar with the ability for late-arriving meeting participants to scroll back to catch up on what they missed. Cisco also does transcription, but apparently “useful” wasn’t one of the themes of its keynote.

I congratulate the army of suppliers that did show up at Enterprise Connect with meaningful, leading-edge capabilities from which real-world users can actually gain value. While that message may be lost on some, that's what our business is about.

BCS_logo_100px_0.jpgBCStrategies is an industry resource for enterprises, vendors, system integrators, and anyone interested in the growing business communications arena. A supplier of objective information on business communications, BCStrategies is supported by an alliance of leading communication industry advisors, analysts, and consultants who have worked in the various segments of the dynamic business communications market.

About the Author

Michael Finneran

Michael F. Finneran, is Principal at dBrn Associates, Inc., a full-service advisory firm specializing in wireless and mobility. With over 40-years experience in networking, Mr. Finneran has become a recognized expert in the field and has assisted clients in a wide range of project assignments spanning service selection, product research, policy development, purchase analysis, and security/technology assessment. The practice addresses both an industry analyst role with vendors as well as serving as a consultant to end users, a combination that provides an in-depth perspective on the industry.

His expertise spans the full range of wireless technologies including Wi-Fi, 3G/4G/5G Cellular and IoT network services as well as fixed wireless, satellite, RFID and Land Mobile Radio (LMR)/first responder communications. Along with a deep understanding of the technical challenges, he also assists clients with the business aspects of mobility including mobile security, policy and vendor comparisons. Michael has provided assistance to carriers, equipment manufacturers, investment firms, and end users in a variety of industry and government verticals. He recently led the technical evaluation for one of the largest cellular contracts in the U.S.

As a byproduct of his consulting assignments, Michael has become a fixture within the industry. He has appeared at hundreds of trade shows and industry conferences, and helps plan the Mobility sessions at Enterprise Connect. Since his first piece in 1980, he has published over 1,000 articles in NoJitter, BCStrategies, InformationWeek, Computerworld, Channel Partners and Business Communications Review, the print predecessor to No Jitter.

Mr. Finneran has conducted over 2,000 seminars on networking topics in the U.S. and around the world, and was an Adjunct Professor in the Graduate Telecommunications Program at Pace University. Along with his technical credentials, Michael holds a Masters Degree in Management from the J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.