This post was written by Jason Alley, lead consultant at Vanguard Communications.
Enterprise customers are becoming more aware of Unified Communications (UC) applications and issues. However, I find many still compartmentalize UC as a futures-only consideration that doesn’t have much bearing on current PBX/ACD investment decisions. After a recent client engagement, I am convinced every enterprise should be armed with a UC Strategy before making a major PBX/ACD decision. Let’s take a closer look at this case study.
Case Study
Our team was asked to help develop a Request for Proposal, and work through the selection process, for a PBX/ACD solution meant to address an immediate office expansion and eventual replacement of an aging PBX and problematic ACD system.
The most critical need was to ensure enterprise users occupying new office space had basic dial-tone and voicemail capabilities. The expansion/move was to take place in fairly short order, so there wasn’t time to analyze and document business requirements. Purchasing a new PBX (from one of the major suppliers) rather than investing in an aging system seemed to make good sense. Our job was to help make sure whatever system selected would support the needs of the contact center and future enterprise requirements.
A few nuggets of information were uncovered while onsite:
Additional analysis was completed and the team determined purchasing a new PBX/ACD system was not the best answer. Why invest $1M+ in a new PBX/ACD platform that will eventually be replaced by its UC successor?
In light of this, the team agreed the preferred path forward was to leverage existing infrastructure for the (immediate) office expansion, upgrade and stabilize the existing ACD system and supplier relationship, conduct needed process optimization and requirements analysis to re-define how the company will manage communications and collaboration in the future, and begin a calculated progression with UC (by job type/category) and contact center enhancements. This approach will enable the client to:
What started out as a simple PBX/ACD replacement project turned into an interesting case study illustrating why it’s critical to have a UC Strategy in place when making today’s PBX/ACD purchase decisions. This seems like a no-brainer but, as mentioned above, too often people compartmentalize UC as a futures-only consideration that doesn’t have much bearing on current investment decisions. Hopefully this case study will help change perceptions and serve as a call to action.
Do you have a UC Strategy in place? How has it impacted/validated your PBX/ACD purchase decisions?
This is a public forum. CMP Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. CMP Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.
Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of CMP Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in CMP Media's Terms of Service.
Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.
